Książki

The combination of the words 'international law' and 'crisis' is intriguing and leads to a number of questions. How does international law react to crises and what are the typical conditions under which the term 'crisis' is invoked? Is international law a vivid field of law due to and thanks to crises? Are parts of international law maybe in crisis themselves? To what extent has the focus on crises taken away attention from important legal questions in the day-to-day application of international law? And does the focus on crisis undermine analytic progress amongst scholars, who might think about crises as being something completely new, asking for new answers while ignoring the relevance of the existing 'international law acquis'? This volume includes eight articles, in the domains of human rights law, migration law, environmental law, international criminal law, WTO law and European law, reflecting upon these pertinent questions, basically asking: do international lawyers do the things right or do they the right things? The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (NYIL) was first published in 1970. It offers a forum for the publication of scholarly articles of a more general nature in the area of public international law including the law of the European Union.

Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2013: Crisis and International Law: Decoy or Catalyst?

Crises: Concern and Fuel for International Law and International Lawyers.- The Crisis and the Quotidian in International Human Rights Law.- The Crisis of International Human Rights Law in the Global Market Economy.- International Refugees and Irregular Migrants: Caught in the Mundane Shadow of Crisis.- Saving Humanity from Hell: International Criminal Law and Permanent Crisis.- Warming to Crisis: The Climate Change Law of Unintended Opportunity.- Between Crisis and Complacency: Seeking Commitment in International Environmental Law.- The WTO and the Doha Negotiation in Crisis? The EU in Crisis: Crisis Discourse as a Technique of Government.- The Thin Line between Deference and Indifference: the Supreme Court of The Netherlands and the Iranian Sanctions Case.